I don’t think Apple is doooomed (h/t to Brian for the meme) but it’s clear that Apple is losing some of its focus on what its users want in its drive to become a media company rather than a computer company. There’s a lengthy article over at Tech Digest that looks at the current Mac lineup (Mini, iMac, and Pro) and comes away unhappy with the lack of a suitable midrange option. And even the top-end Pro has woefully underpowered graphics in comparison to the rest of the field.
Of course, on the media company front, things aren’t all that rosy from userland either. With the introduction of the anticipated touchscreen Video iPod, Apple has cut the price on the high-end iPhone by a third – $200 (!). Woe unto the early adopters who were tempted by the Apple and adopted early. This is the sort of arseholeish behavior by Apple that makes me, someone who was waiting for exactly the phone-less iPhone device that the touchscreen iPod represents, extremely unlikely to go out on a limb and invest in one.
More and more, it seems like Apple is crafting a “experience” for its users, informing them of what they need and substituting style for substance. And treating it’s users like chumps in the process, under the (probably accurate) assumption that they will come crawling back for more. It’s ironic that Apple’s slogan used to be, “Think Different”. More and more, making the sizable investment in Apple’s hardware means quite the opposite. It isn’t quite Camazotz yet, but then again, everyone on the street does seem to be wearing white earbuds nowadays…
UPDATE: Fake Steve Jobs weighs in. Also, he’s got an extra-special offer for the early adopters of yesteryear.
UPDATE 2: don’t miss this column by Cringely. Excerpt:
Steve does things like this because he can. It reaffirms his iron grip over both Apple and Appleâ€™s customers. Itâ€™s a lot about ego and a little about business, though with Steve Jobs they are hard to differentiate.
Here is something very important to remember about Steve Jobs (and probably the only part of this column that will bother him in the least): most of his business moves are still in reaction to having been fired by Apple back in 1985.
It’s a fascinating deconstruction of the whole pricing fiasco and the consequences. Bottom line: Apple milks $75 million extra profit out of its hard-core fanbase. What else are they good for, after all? Read the whole thing.
5 thoughts on “O Apple, why hast thou forsaken us?”
You still feel that way after reading this?
from the article, Apple will give pre-price-cut iPhone owners a $100 Apple gift certificate. Doesn’t this underscore the utterly arbitrary nature of the pricing of the phone in the first place? Or more importantly, the arbitrary nature of the pricing on the new iPods just announced yesterday? How this news is supposed to entice someone like me to buy Apple is beyond me. And I’m sure that someone who was previously feeling a $200-sized pain in the wallet is feeling somewhat better, but they’re still $100 in the hole (assuming you equate a gift certificate for Apple purchases with cash).
I don’t understand. If apple decides they can sell the phones for less, no matter when they figure this out, you don’t want Apple to? You want to keep the price at a point that is so high they either think its retarding sales, or is unecessarily profitable, just to salve your conscious about some ‘investment’ in a moving frontier?
you’re right, you don’t understand – I am saying that Apple’s initial price on the iPhone was tantamount to price gouging, the initial price cut was cruel and unwise, and Jobs’ reaction served only to emphasize how arbitrary the pricing and subsequent cut truly were.
And yeah, the iphone early adopters should be glad for the scraps they are given; better than nothing, but I’m not going to willingly subject myself to the same abuse.
And how do you know this? How do you know the availability or price of a key component didn’t suddenly drop massively? Or that after studying the initial numbers, they realized they could afford to sell at a loss through partnering with ATT?
Comments are closed.