<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commendable, not recommendable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.haibane.info/2006/12/07/commendable-not-recommendable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.haibane.info/2006/12/07/commendable-not-recommendable/</link>
	<description>a celebration of science fiction, anime, and geek culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Istre</title>
		<link>http://www.haibane.info/2006/12/07/commendable-not-recommendable/#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Istre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 01:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.haibane.info/2006/12/07/commendable-not-recommendable/#comment-624</guid>
		<description>Well, the fact that &lt;i&gt;Grave of the Fireflies&lt;/i&gt; is based off of a well known book in Japan (one that's required reading in some Japanese schools from what I understand) gave that movie a guaranteed audience.  That should make it much less surprising that &lt;i&gt;GotF&lt;/i&gt; was the one that was supposed to carry &lt;i&gt;Totoro&lt;/i&gt;.

There's quite a bit of infomation on &lt;a href="http://www.nausicaa.net/miyazaki/grave/" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Grave of the Fireflies&lt;i&gt; on Nausicaa.net&lt;/a&gt;.  Especially check out the FAQ there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the fact that <i>Grave of the Fireflies</i> is based off of a well known book in Japan (one that&#8217;s required reading in some Japanese schools from what I understand) gave that movie a guaranteed audience.  That should make it much less surprising that <i>GotF</i> was the one that was supposed to carry <i>Totoro</i>.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s quite a bit of infomation on <a href="http://www.nausicaa.net/miyazaki/grave/" rel="nofollow"><i>Grave of the Fireflies</i><i> on Nausicaa.net</i></a>.  Especially check out the FAQ there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.haibane.info/2006/12/07/commendable-not-recommendable/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 21:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.haibane.info/2006/12/07/commendable-not-recommendable/#comment-622</guid>
		<description>The funny thing about the back-to-back factoid is that they decided to do it because they thought Totoro was a "difficult sell."  I did a double take when I read that.  The Onion AV Club is definitely not satire, but in a case like this, it sure seems like it!

(Thanks for the link:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The funny thing about the back-to-back factoid is that they decided to do it because they thought Totoro was a &#8220;difficult sell.&#8221;  I did a double take when I read that.  The Onion AV Club is definitely not satire, but in a case like this, it sure seems like it!</p>
<p>(Thanks for the link:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kerpan</title>
		<link>http://www.haibane.info/2006/12/07/commendable-not-recommendable/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kerpan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.haibane.info/2006/12/07/commendable-not-recommendable/#comment-620</guid>
		<description>No -- the story is not satirical.  This is indeed how the two films were initially shown in Japanese theaters.  I've seen this mentioned in interviews given by Miyazaki and Takahata.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No &#8212; the story is not satirical.  This is indeed how the two films were initially shown in Japanese theaters.  I&#8217;ve seen this mentioned in interviews given by Miyazaki and Takahata.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Den Beste</title>
		<link>http://www.haibane.info/2006/12/07/commendable-not-recommendable/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 19:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.haibane.info/2006/12/07/commendable-not-recommendable/#comment-618</guid>
		<description>I think that the "back-to-back" story was from the Onion article, which is satire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the &#8220;back-to-back&#8221; story was from the Onion article, which is satire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kerpan</title>
		<link>http://www.haibane.info/2006/12/07/commendable-not-recommendable/#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kerpan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 19:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.haibane.info/2006/12/07/commendable-not-recommendable/#comment-617</guid>
		<description>Fireflies is not a film that expects to be liked -- but rather one that invites (or even expects) reflection. ;~}

But there is no doubt that watching Only Yesterday (and Yamadas -- and Anne of Green Gables, etc) is a lot more fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fireflies is not a film that expects to be liked &#8212; but rather one that invites (or even expects) reflection. ;~}</p>
<p>But there is no doubt that watching Only Yesterday (and Yamadas &#8212; and Anne of Green Gables, etc) is a lot more fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fledgling otaku</title>
		<link>http://www.haibane.info/2006/12/07/commendable-not-recommendable/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>fledgling otaku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 18:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.haibane.info/2006/12/07/commendable-not-recommendable/#comment-616</guid>
		<description>heh, that's about what I'd expect. I cant think of two movies more opposite in tone than Totoro and Fireflies.

To be honest I will eventually see Fireflies again, and when I do I am sure I will like it better than I did last time. Still, there are many, many more pressing priorities ahead of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh, that&#8217;s about what I&#8217;d expect. I cant think of two movies more opposite in tone than Totoro and Fireflies.</p>
<p>To be honest I will eventually see Fireflies again, and when I do I am sure I will like it better than I did last time. Still, there are many, many more pressing priorities ahead of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kerpan</title>
		<link>http://www.haibane.info/2006/12/07/commendable-not-recommendable/#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kerpan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.haibane.info/2006/12/07/commendable-not-recommendable/#comment-615</guid>
		<description>Takahata has noted that audiences who actually saw the double-header had little or no trouble with "Fireflies" when they saw this first -- but responded noticeablly less well when they happened to see "Totoro" first. ;~}

While people tend to be disinclined to see this film more than once, I really do think that the film really only comes into its own when one does re-watch it -- and can follow it much more critically (rather than simply responding emotionally).   The feelings that it evokes are complex.  Andm on revisitation, one might even note that the very last moments of the film are actually comparatively happy ones

Yes -- this does not make for easy viewing -- but neither does classical drama.  This is pretty easy going compared to a masterpiece like Euripides' "Bacchae"..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Takahata has noted that audiences who actually saw the double-header had little or no trouble with &#8220;Fireflies&#8221; when they saw this first &#8212; but responded noticeablly less well when they happened to see &#8220;Totoro&#8221; first. ;~}</p>
<p>While people tend to be disinclined to see this film more than once, I really do think that the film really only comes into its own when one does re-watch it &#8212; and can follow it much more critically (rather than simply responding emotionally).   The feelings that it evokes are complex.  Andm on revisitation, one might even note that the very last moments of the film are actually comparatively happy ones</p>
<p>Yes &#8212; this does not make for easy viewing &#8212; but neither does classical drama.  This is pretty easy going compared to a masterpiece like Euripides&#8217; &#8220;Bacchae&#8221;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
